Oklahoma
Bar Association
Guidelines for Professional Courtesy |
|
Preamble
A lawyers primary responsibility is to the client. Yet,
in striving to fulfill that responsibility, as an officer of the
court a lawyer should be ever mindful of a higher duty to the
judicial system, which serves the ends of justice and fairness.
Accordingly:
***
A lawyer owes to the judiciary honesty, candor, diligence and
the utmost respect;
***
A lawyer owes to the opposing counsel, duties of courtesy and
cooperation, necessary for the efficient administration of
justice;
***
A lawyer owes to the profession and the bar, by way of
example, duties of personal dignity and professional integrity.
***
In furtherance of these fundamental principles, the following
Guidelines For Professional Courtesy hereby are adopted.
Courtesy, Civility and Professionalism
1. General Statement
- A lawyer should treat other lawyers, the opposing party,
the court and the members of the court staff with
courtesy and civility and conduct business in a
professional manner at all times.
- The client has no right to demand that counsel abuse the
opposite party or indulge in offensive conduct. A lawyer
always should treat adverse witnesses and suitors with
fairness and due consideration.
- In adversary proceedings, clients are litigants and
though ill feelings may exist between clients, such
feelings should not influence a lawyers conduct,
attitude or demeanor toward opposing lawyers.
2. Discussion
- A lawyer should not engage in discourtesies or offensive
conduct with opposing counsel, whether at hearings,
depositions or any other time when involved in the
representation of clients. In all contacts with the court
and court personnel, counsel should treat the court and
its staff with courtesy and respect and without regard to
whether counsel agrees or disagrees with rulings of the
court in any specific case. Further, counsel should not
denigrate the court or opposing counsel in private
conversations with a client. We should remember that the
disrespect brought upon members of the Bar and the
judiciary reflects on us and our profession as well.
- A lawyer should be punctual in fulfilling all
professional commitments and in communicating with the
court and other lawyers, including the returning of
telephone calls.
Depositions, Hearings and Discovery Matters
1. General Statement
- A lawyer should make reasonable efforts to conduct all
discovery by agreement.
- A lawyer should not use any form of discovery, or the
scheduling of discovery, as a means of harassing anyone.
- Requests for production should not be excessive or
designed solely to place a burden on the opposing party,
for such conduct in discovery only increases the costs,
duration and unpleasantness of any case.
2 Scheduling
A lawyer should, when practical, consult with opposing counsel
before scheduling hearings and depositions in a good faith
attempt to avoid scheduling conflicts.
3. Discussion
- General Guidelines
- When scheduling hearings and depositions, a
lawyer should communicate with opposing counsel
in an attempt to schedule them at mutually
agreeable times. This practice will minimize
unnecessary delays, expense to clients, and
stress to lawyers and their secretaries.
- If a request is made to clear time for a hearing
or deposition, the lawyer to whom the request is
made should confirm that the time is available or
advise of a conflict within a reasonable time
(preferably the same business day, but, in any
event, before the end of the following business
day).
- Conflicts should be indicated only when they
actually exist and the requested time is not
available. The courtesy requested by this
guideline should not be used for the purpose of
obtaining delay or advantage.
|
- Exception to General Guidelines
- A lawyer who has attempted to comply with the
above is justified in setting a hearing or
deposition without agreement if opposing counsel
fails or refuses promptly to accept or reject a
time offered for hearing or deposition.
- If opposing counsel raises an unreasonable number
of calendar conflicts, a lawyer is justified in
setting a hearing or deposition without agreement
from opposing counsel.
- If opposing counsel consistently has failed to
comply with the above guidelines, a lawyer is
justified in setting a hearing or deposition
without agreement from opposing counsel.
- When an action involves so many lawyers that
compliance with the above guidelines appears
impractical, a lawyer still should make a good
faith effort to comply with the above guidelines.
- In cases involving extraordinary remedies where
time associated with scheduling agreements could
cause damage or harm to a clients case,
then a lawyer is justified in setting a hearing
or deposition without agreement from opposing
counsel.
|
4. Minimum Notice for Depositions and Hearings
- Depositions and hearings should not be set with less than
one week notice except by agreement of counsel or when a
genuine need or emergency exists.
- If opposing counsel makes a reasonable request which does
not prejudice the rights of the client, compliance
herewith is appropriate without motions, briefs,
hearings, orders and other formalities and without
attempting to exact unrelated or unreasonable
consideration.
5. Canceling Depositions, Hearings and Other Discovery
Matters
- General Statement. Notice of cancellation of depositions
and hearings should be given to the court and opposing
counsel at the earliest possible time.
- Discussion
- Calling at or just prior to the time of a
scheduled hearing or deposition to advise the
court or opposing counsel of the cancellation
lacks courtesy and consideration. This should be
avoided.
- Early notice of cancellation of a deposition or a
hearing avoids unnecessary travel and
expenditures of time by opposing counsel,
witnesses, and parties. In addition, early notice
of cancellation of hearings to the court allows
the time previously reserved to be used for other
matters.
|
Service of Papers Filed with the Court
1. General Statement
A lawyer should not attempt to gain advantage by delay in
service of pleadings or correspondence upon opposing counsel.
2. Discussion
- When pleading or correspondence are mailed to the court,
copies should be mailed the same day to all other counsel
of record, both local and out of town.
- When pleadings or correspondence are hand delivered to
the court and a response is due or a hearing is scheduled
within seven (7) days, or a ruling by the court is
expected promptly, such papers should be delivered the
same day to all counsel of record in the same city and
should be sent by a means reasonably calculated to bring
them to the immediate attention of opposing counsel in
other cities.
Agreements and Stipulations of Undisputed
Matters
1. General Statement
- A lawyer should stipulate to undisputed matters not
inconsistent with the clients interests.
- A lawyer should abide by all promises and agreements with
an opposing counsel, whether or not in writing.
2. Discussion
- A lawyer should be willing to agree to and stipulate to
undisputed matters to avoid unnecessary use of court time
and inconvenience. In doing so the counsel seeking a
stipulation should request a stipulation in writing.
- Opposing counsel promptly should inform the counsel
requesting the stipulation whether the stipulation is
agreeable.
- A reasonable time to respond to the request generally
would require no more than one week from the time the
request for stipulation is received.
- In the preparation of agreements, achievement of a
jointly desired common goal is often hindered by the
practice of preparing draft agreements which include
terms neither desired nor insisted upon by the party.
When preparing a draft of an agreement, a lawyer should
attempt to state the actual anticipated agreement of the
parties and avoid inclusion of terms which would hinder
the finalization of an agreement.
- It is appropriate to honor requests of opposing counsel
made during trial which do not prejudice the rights of
the client or sacrifice tactical advantage. For example,
counsel could freely share estimates of time, disclose
the identity of the next witness to be called or the next
deposition to be read, share a projector or video tape
screen, and cooperate in other matters of this nature
routinely encountered in trial by trial counsel.
Time Deadlines and Extensions
1. General Statement
Reasonable extensions of time should be granted to opposing
counsel where such extension will not have a material, adverse
effect on the rights of the client.
2. Discussion
- Because we all live in a world of deadlines, additional
time is often required to complete a given task.
- Traditionally, members of the bar have readily conceded
to any reasonable request for an extension of time as an
accommodation to opposing counsel who, because of a busy
trial schedule, personal emergency or heavy work load,
needs additional time to prepare a response or comply
with a legal requirement.
- This tradition should continue; provided, however, that
no lawyer should request an extension of time solely for
the purpose of delay or to obtain any unfair advantage.
- Counsel should make every effort to honor previously
scheduled vacations of opposing counsel which dates have
been established in good faith.
Communications with the Judge and Court
Personnel
1. General Statement
- Only lawyers should communicate with the judge or appear
in court on substantive matters.
- Non-lawyers may communicate with court personnel
regarding scheduling matters and other nonsubstantive
matters.
2. Discussion
- A lawyer should make no attempt to obtain an advantage in
a case by an ex parte communication with the court. Any
appearance of such a communication should be scrupulously
avoided.
- A lawyer should avoid unnecessary inclusion of the court
in correspondence. If a matter does not merit the filing
of a motion or of an agreed order, it probably does not
warrant involving the judge or clerk in correspondence.
Only correspondence which has been requested by the
court, or is merely filed to record the service of
documents, should be sent to the court.
Fundamental Courtroom Decorum
1. General Statement
In open court a lawyer should demonstrate courteous,
respectful behavior at all times.
2. Discussion
- A lawyer should stand while talking to or being addressed
by any judge.
- A lawyer should not approach the bench unless permission
to do so is granted by the court.
- All Argument should be directed to the court, not to
opposing counsel.
Guidelines Comment
Most of the guidelines set forth above deal with situations
where the courts will be affected, directly or indirectly, by the
actions of the attorneys involved. Therefore, Oklahoma attorneys
are urged to comply with the Guidelines in the interests of
judicial economy, professional harmony and, ultimately,
enhancement of the publics perception of the system and the
profession. By design, the Guidelines are not exhaustive. Many
aspects of attorney conduct are not covered. For example,
attempts to intimidate through surly remarks or behavior,
baseless motions, needlessly extended deposition hearings,
threats of sanctions and refusals to deal with other attorneys
except through secretaries are too obvious or subjective to lend
themselves to specific treatment in such guidelines or are dealt
with in existing court rules. In addition, "Fundamental
Courtroom Decorum" only includes basic courtesies
attorneys should extend in open court; other requirements for the
most part have been set forth in District Court Rules, statewide
and local. If a specific guideline is not involved in a
transaction which is troubling or offensive, the lawyers involved
are urged to apply the Golden Rule to guide their actions: Do
unto attorneys (and judges) as you would have them do unto you.
Enacted by OBA Board of Governors
November 17, 1989
Back
to Codes of Professional Ethics